The Silencing of Parents (a comment on Ontario Bill #89)

Do you and I as parents have the freedom to teach our children what is right and what is wrong? If my son wanted to dress like a girl and I told him that he should really dress like a boy, according to the Ontario Liberal government I would be impinging on the rights of my son and he would be considered “a child in need” and they would then have the right to remove my son from his home out from under my care and teaching.

Just this past week in our Ontario Legislature, Queen’s Park, the Ontario Liberal government under the leadership of Kathleen Wynne has pushed through a radical bill known as Bill 89. A bill that was written apparently for the protection of children but is also threatening parents who believe their children should be taught otherwise.

As a pastor and a father, I have written letters to our local Member of Provincial Parliament as well as to the committee overseeing the passage of the Bill, but unfortunately my MPP simply answered with a letter from his party focussing on other legitimate needs for the bill and not even addressing my concerns.  I did hear back from a few members of the oversight committee who also shared my concerns {I also understand that there were over 40 amendments recommended to the Liberal government to change the Bill in order to protect parents and the Liberal government turned them all down.}

This Bill 89 is very concerning for the following reasons: First of all, Bill 89 expands the definition of what actually is a “child in need”. Granted there are children who are in need of protection from abusive environments.  But when a parent in good faith, and in loving care is teaching their children the traditional roles of sexuality, roles that actually naturally make sense, they can also fall into the category of “unsafe“. There is definitely something wrong here. Over the past few years the Ontario Liberal government, under Kathleen Wynne has been pushing a confused gender ideology onto the Child services of Ontario…and now Bill 89 threatens any parent who teaches their children otherwise.

So now what do I do? I, as a parent of three children, who does not ascribe or believe in the homosexual ideology and gender theory of the Liberal government. It is simply not in accordance with my religious beliefs. It doesn’t line up with the authority of the Bible. So, should one of my children happen to express to me their interest in “identifying with homosexuality” I would, in good faith, and loving concern for their growth and development would teach them what I believe. And the Liberal government is seeking to silence that parental role and responsibility of teaching my own children what it means to be a man and what it means to be a woman. Thereby, this Liberal government is actually removing parental rights and responsibilities.

Mr. Coteau (Liberal Minister of Children & Youth Services) recently stated:  “I would consider that a form of abuse, when a child identifies one way [LGBT+] and a caregiver is saying no, you need to do this differently,” and “If it’s abuse, and if it’s within the definition, a child can be removed from that environment and placed into protection where the abuse stops.”  So now, because I do not adhere to the homosexual ideology, and I teach my children differently…I am now considered “a child abuser“?  Something desperately has been confused.

Bill 89 also states that parents (and Children’s Aid Services etc) must bring up the child in accordance with the child’s creed. This is essentially diminishing the role of parents.  Someone needs to inform the Liberal government that it is actually the role of parents to teach the creeds and the religious beliefs. It is not the role of a school teacher, judge or the MPP or Premier. It is the parents role and responsibility! That is the way that God designed the family. What right does this government think they have to remove that right and responsibility from parents?

Should my wife and I ever consider fostering children or adopting children, which is a great need today, and if I were to teach that child a traditional belief in male and female roles, this government would seek to stop that from happening based upon this Bill 89 because judges will have to base their decisions on “what is the best interest of the child.”

This Bill #89 needs to be clarified before it is ratified. It needs to have some form of inclusion whereby parents of faith and other religious practices that do not ascribe to the homosexual agenda have their rights protected too…and that parents, as the God given and God designed family authority have the freedom to teach according to their own personal creed and faith practices.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s